Really Have a System of Rules

Does the English Language Really Have a System of Rules?

What amount do you think about the English language? Attempt this little test. Are these announcements in every case genuine?

1. "Everyone" is a particular pronoun.

2. Use "who" for individuals, "that" for things.

3. Twofold negatives ("don't have none") aren't right since two negatives make a positive.

4. "One" in particular, and "five" is plural.

5. It's inappropriate to utilize "great" to change an action word.

6. Great essayists don't begin sentences with "yet."

Every one of the announcements is bogus. Shocked? How about we investigate.

1. Obviously "everyone" is normally solitary. Yet, investigate these two sentences:

Everyone completed early. How could they answer each one of those inquiries so rapidly?

Nobody would supplant "they" in the second sentence with "the person in question."

The "everybody...he or she" rule returns to 1795 when a self-broadcasted grammarian named Lindley Murray designed it for a book that proceeded to turn into a blockbuster.

Before Murray composed his book (and, some state, wrecked a consummately useful linguistic structure), "they" was a free-skimming pronoun that could be either solitary or plural. (English, recollect, has lost the valuable sex free particular pronouns that numerous different dialects still have.)

"He" became "the individual" in the twentieth century to make English increasingly comprehensive. Women's activists all over the place (I'm one!) generously affirm that change...but it included a cumbersome, unnatural development to numerous sentences. Some language specialists are urging essayists to return to the first "everybody...they" development that everybody utilized before Murray went along.

2. Indeed, "that" ought to be saved for things. For instance, The medical caretaker that dealt with my sister ought to be changed to "who dealt with my sister."

Be that as it may, in the same way as another sentence structure administers, this one doesn't work inevitably. Investigate this sentence:

He's the main man that I am aware of who has visited every one of the 50 states.

3. The "two negatives make a positive" contention against twofold negatives appears to bode well - until you understand that numerous different dialects (Spanish is one) routinely utilize twofold negatives, even informal composition. Also, on the off chance that you study Old English, you'll find that our language used to have twofold negatives as well.

Why are twofold negatives OK in Spanish and in Old English, yet not in present-day English? The appropriate response is that informed individuals don't utilize them. That straightforward rule is the reason for each standard.

4. Obviously "one" in particular and "five" is plural- - more often than not. However, shouldn't something be said about this sentence?

Five dollars is an excessive amount to pay for a gallon of gas.

"Five dollars" is a unit, not five separate things, as in this sentence:

Five stores are shutting since the business has been so moderate.

5. Truly, action words require verb modifiers (well, - ly words), and things require descriptors (great). In any case, not generally. Types of the action word to be and its cousins, the joining action words (appear, look, sound, smell, taste, feel) additionally use descriptors.

Think about feeling, which has two implications. It very well may be an activity (as when you feel for a light switch in an obscured room). In any case, it can likewise be a type of is (I like my odds for the activity).

Note these models:

The soup smells pleasant.

Your thought sounds great to me.

That shading looks great on you.

6. The "you can't begin a sentence with, however" rule doesn't exist and never has. It doesn't show up in any language structure books- - in actuality the punctuation books themselves highlight sentences that start with, however. (Did you notice that three sentences in this article start with, however?)

Incredible scholars, both old and new, routinely start sentences with, however. Check the King James Bible, the Declaration of Independence, the books of Jane Austen and Charles Dickens, the present newspaper...any proficient keeping in touch with you have convenient. Take a gander at The Elements of Style by Strunk and White and Fowler's Modern English Usage. Turn the pages of Lynn Truss' Eats, Shoots and Leaves. You'll make some hard memories finding a creator who doesn't begin sentences with yet (I haven't found any yet).

Main concern: Don't attempt to compel a sentence to fit into a sensible framework. Peruse, read, read. Make sense of what great journalists do, and use them as models. You'll before long be en route to ability.

Post a comment